Skip to content
CONFIGLANE

Cryptography · Operations

From 398 to 47 days: what short TLS certificates set off in a network

The reduction is decided, staged and already partly in force. It does not only hit web servers — it hits every place in the network where a certificate sits that someone renews by hand once a year.

By ConfiglanePublished 6 min readNetwork Automation

The short version

  • The maximum lifetime of publicly trusted TLS certificates drops in stages: 200 days since 15 March 2026, 100 days from 15 March 2027, 47 days from 15 March 2029.
  • Domain validation reuse falls to the same values in parallel, and to ten days from 2029. Validation therefore becomes due at almost every issuance.
  • At 47 days you renew roughly eight times as often as in the previous 398-day rhythm. Manual renewal stops being a saving and becomes an outage risk.
  • The network holds the inconspicuous certificates: device web interfaces, wireless controllers, guest portals, RADIUS server certificates for EAP-TLS, VPN gateways and management platforms.

Certificates are treated as a solved problem: buy one, install it, set a calendar reminder, enjoy a year of quiet. That model is being abolished right now — not at once, but in three steps, the first of which is already running.

The schedule and where we are in it

In April 2025 the CA/Browser Forum decided to lower the maximum validity of publicly trusted TLS certificates step by step. The period during which a completed domain validation may be reused shrinks alongside it.

FromMaximum lifetimeDomain validation reuse
until 15 March 2026398 days398 days
15 March 2026200 days200 days
15 March 2027100 days100 days
15 March 202947 days10 days
Maximum lifetime and domain validation reuse

In addition, since 15 March 2026 the validation of Subject Identity Information may only be reused for 398 days instead of 825 — which affects OV and EV certificates, exactly the class enterprises often use for portals and services.

Where it hurts in the network

The discussion usually revolves around web servers. Automation has been normal there for years and the pain is limited. The awkward certificates sit elsewhere — everywhere a network device terminates TLS itself:

  • Web interfaces of switches, routers and firewalls. Usually self-signed or internally issued, often untouched since commissioning.
  • Wireless controllers and guest portals. An expired portal certificate produces no monitoring alert but a warning page on every device in the building.
  • RADIUS server certificates for EAP-TLS. When this expires, clients stop authenticating to the wireless network or the 802.1X-protected port outright — the loudest failure imaginable.
  • VPN gateways and remote access. Expiry hits the people working from outside first, which typically means the on-call engineers.
  • Management platforms and controllers. They speak TLS to each other; an expired certificate does not interrupt traffic but does interrupt control.

The order that works

The reflex is to buy a certificate management platform. The more effective first step is duller and costs nothing but time: find out how many certificates exist at all and who renews them.

  1. Certificate inventory

    Every TLS-terminating point with issuer, expiry, owner and renewal path. Gathered actively — by querying the endpoints, not by circulating a survey.

  2. Classification

    Publicly trusted or internal? Only the first class falls under the schedule, but the second decides how many procedures you end up operating.

  3. An automation path per class

    ACME wherever it is supported; EST or SCEP where network devices meet an internal PKI. What matters is not the protocol but that exactly one applies per class.

  4. Name the exceptions

    Some devices cannot automate. They belong on a short, justified list with a date — not in the quiet remainder.

  5. Expiry monitoring

    An alert 30 days ahead becomes a permanent tone at 47-day lifetimes. The threshold belongs tied to the lifetime, not to a fixed number.

Why this is an automation topic

The reduction is not a security problem you solve with more care. It is a change of frequency, and frequency is solved with repeatability. A certificate swap that runs as a change through the same path as any other configuration change — versioned, tested, logged — costs no more at 47 days than at 398.

That is the same principle we describe under network automation: the effort of a task is decided less by its difficulty than by how often it is done by hand. How the certificate estate fits the wider picture is described under enterprise networks.

What to do now

The 200-day step is already running. Order a certificate with a one-year term today and you will not get one. That is the simplest opportunity to build the inventory: the next renewal wave arrives earlier than planned anyway, so it can carry the survey with it.

The second date is 15 March 2027. By then every class should have an automated path and the exception list should be shorter than today. Starting only in 2029 means migrating under outage pressure instead of calmly.

Sources

Every evidenced claim in this article can be traced here. The retrieval date shows how fresh the check is.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about short certificate lifetimes

When do 47-day TLS certificates take effect?

The 47-day maximum applies from 15 March 2029. Before that there is a schedule: a 200-day maximum since 15 March 2026 and a 100-day maximum from 15 March 2027. So the planning target today is not 2029 but the 100-day step just over a year out — that is the one that breaks the yearly manual routine, because renewal then falls due several times a year.

Does the reduction apply to our internal PKI as well?

The CA/Browser Forum requirement binds publicly trusted certificate authorities. An in-house PKI is not covered and can issue longer lifetimes. In practice there is still a good case for putting both worlds on one automated process: two procedures side by side mean double maintenance and the risk that the manual one quietly falls behind.

What happens when a certificate on a network device expires?

It depends on the service. On a web interface you get a warning and carry on. On a RADIUS server certificate for EAP-TLS, clients refuse to authenticate — the network appears to fail from one minute to the next although no device is faulty. Those certificates therefore belong at the top of the inventory.

Is monitoring expiry dates enough?

As a safety net yes, as a solution no. An alert tells you somebody has to act — at eight times the frequency, eight times as often. The sensible combination is automated renewal as the norm and expiry monitoring as the check that the automation actually worked.

Which protocols are candidates for network devices?

ACME is the standard path for publicly trusted certificates and is increasingly supported by networking and security products too. Where an internal PKI is involved, EST and SCEP are common. The choice matters less than the decision: one path per device class, documented and tested.

Next step

Does this hold for your network?

An assessment answers the question against your infrastructure rather than an example — ending in a first dependable change.

Request an assessment

Assessment → first dependable change